Implementing a WMS implementation checklist for Cin7

Learn how Cin7 WMS improves warehouse accuracy across receiving, picking, transfers, returns, and inventory counts. A practical, operations-driven guide to fixing ghost stock, mispicks, and inventory drift, plus how Fiskal helps you build a system you can trust.

SYSTEMS AND SOFTWAREECOMMERCE

Pierre Goldie

12/15/20255 min read

Implementing a WMS implementation checklist for Cin7

Pierre Goldie, Co-founder & CGO @ Fiskal

Warehouse accuracy issues rarely come from staff, they come from misaligned systems. A WMS implementation determines how warehouse processes flow into inventory accuracy, fulfillment reliability, and financial reporting. When configuration, workflows, and accounting don't align, errors quietly compound: stock appears in the wrong bins, transfers fail to reconcile, and finance teams spend hours repairing variances.

Fiskal sees this pattern across nearly every WMS audit: operational issues are almost always symptoms of structural misalignment.

This guide consolidates all Cin7 WMS workflows (receiving, transfers, pick/pack, restocks, stocktakes, write-offs, lookup) into an end-to-end implementation checklist built around the failure patterns we see most often.

Executive summary

Most WMS accuracy problems aren’t operational, they come from misaligned setup, configuration, and workflows. A clean WMS implementation prevents the issues that cause stock drift, stuck transfers, and bad financials. With teams losing 16 hours/week reconciling disconnected systems, getting this right the first time matters. This checklist provides the structure needed for reliable warehouse accuracy.

Why WMS implementations break

Common patterns across misconfigured environments:

  • Receiving against Draft POs

  • Incorrect bin assignments

  • Skipped scanning

  • Transfers picked but not sent

  • Items stuck in transit

  • Stocktake overwrites

  • Incorrect GL mappings

  • Restocks with no credit notes

These issues are structural, not operational, and nearly all originate during setup.

Step 1 - Core configuration: build the foundation

A stable WMS is created in configuration, not in the warehouse. This is where 80% of accuracy issues begin.

Warehouse zones, bins & scanning rules

Cin7 depends on bin-level governance:

  • Bin locations must mirror the floor layout

  • Scan-only zones for high-risk/serialized SKUs

  • Manual entry only in controlled bulk areas

  • Every active SKU must have a default bin

  • Physical bins must match system bins pre-go-live

Poor bin logic drives ghost stock, incorrect picks, and recurring stocktake variances.

Accounting alignment

Before go-live, finance must align:

  • In-transit accounts for transfer reconciliation

  • Write-off/shrinkage accounts for variances

  • Stocktake adjustment accounts mapped correctly

Misaligned accounts distort COGS, inflate assets, and break month-end.

Cin7 WMS configuration

Key settings that determine workflow behavior:

  • Picking rules (single vs multi-picker)

  • Scan enforcement

  • Scheduled picks

  • Kit-component visibility

  • Stocktake locking

  • Write-off mappings

Fiskal frequently fixes issues originating from these settings during Cin7 Onboarding Support.

For full implementation alignment, Fiskal’s Cin7 Implementation Services ensure configuration is correct from the start:

Step 2 - Workflow design: core flows & failure modes

Below are the required Cin7 workflows with combined failures + validation guidance to reduce redundancy while retaining depth.

Receiving inventory

Correct flow:

  • PO approved

  • PO scanned

  • Items scanned/entered

  • Items placed in correct bins

  • Receiving completed

  • Landed costs applied in Core

Common failures & validation:

Draft PO receiving breaks landed costs; wrong bins create “missing stock”; skipped scans introduce SKU errors; unbinned stock inflates availability.
Run validation by simulating Draft PO receiving, wrong-bin scans, and unbinned items.

Stock transfers

Correct flow:

  • Create transfer

  • Pick

  • Send

  • Items move to “In Transit”

  • Receive

  • Reconcile

Common failures & validation:

Picked but not sent = overstated inventory; sent but not received = understated inventory; wrong-bin scans hide stock; skipped scans move wrong SKUs.
Validate by creating aged transfers and ensuring reconciliation logic holds.

Learn how to manage stock transfers between warehouse locations using the Cin7 Core WMS mobile app. Here in Fiskal’s Youtube Series.

Restocking returned items

Correct flow:

  • Identify sales order

  • Scan returned items

  • Confirm quantity

  • Restock

  • Generate credit note

  • Process refund/store credit

Common failures & validation:

Draft PO receiving breaks landed costs; wrong bins create “missing stock”; skipped scans introduce SKU errors; unbinned stock inflates availability.
Run validation by simulating Draft PO receiving, wrong-bin scans, and unbinned items.

Pick & pack

Correct flow:

  • Scan order

  • Pick

  • Finish picking

  • Pack

  • Confirm shipment

Common failures & validation:

Skipped scans ship wrong SKUs; un-finished picks leave orders stuck; partial shipments misinterpreted.
Validate by comparing manual vs scanned picks.

Stocktakes / inventory counts

Correct flow:

  • Full counts (desktop)

  • Cycle counts (WMS)

  • Scope filtering

  • Variance review

  • GL posting

Common failures & validation:

Uncounted SKUs default to zero; variances approved without review; incorrect GL mapping distorts COGS.
Validate by reviewing variance posting behavior and scope control.

Lookup & write-offs

Correct flow:

  • SKU selection

  • Accurate reason

  • Correct date

  • Correct account

Common failures & validation:

Posting to wrong accounts, incorrect backdating, and variances removed without review frequently create financial inconsistencies.
Fiskal fixes these issues through 3PL & EDI Mapping Services, especially for multi-location flows:

Step 3 - Deployment & governance

A WMS will drift without governance. Here is the compressed version of essential oversight activities.

Monthly checks (simplified)

  • Review aged transfers

  • Verify write-off postings

  • Audit restock/credit note consistency

  • Ensure no unbinned SKUs

Quarterly configuration review (simplified)

  • Validate scan enforcement & picking rules

  • Reconfirm stocktake configuration

  • Validate GL mappings

  • Check for changes after Cin7 updates

Multi-warehouse operations introduce greater risk of transfer drift, inconsistent processes, and configuration divergence. Fiskal’s Warehouse Operations & Industry Support stabilises these environments and keeps every site operating from the same source of truth.

Operational performance monitoring

  • Picker error patterns

  • Packing throughput

  • Repeated variances by SKU or bin

  • Frequent write-offs

These indicators highlight early signs of system drift.

Preventing long-term drift

Even with a clean Cin7 implementation, accuracy can erode over time without operational discipline and financial oversight. These advanced considerations prevent the long-term drift we see in many rescue projects.

Cycle counting discipline

Stock accuracy depends on a repeatable cadence:

  • Use ABC classification: A-items weekly, B monthly, C quarterly.

  • Run scoped cycle counts (bin, zone, tag).

  • Track recurring variances and correlate with bin layout or user behavior.

  • Always review variances before posting.

Fiskal includes cycle-count frameworks in ongoing support to maintain year-round accuracy.

Warehouse layout & slotting

Software accuracy depends on physical alignment:

  • Slot fast movers near dispatch.

  • Maintain clear bin labeling and paths that match scanner logic.

  • Separate bulk storage from pick faces with defined replenishment triggers.

  • Avoid overlapping zones that cause SKU ambiguity.

Fiskal’s design audits often uncover efficiency and accuracy gains purely through layout realignment.

Transfer governance

Transfers introduce the highest risk of drift:

  • Reconcile aged transfers (anything over 7 days is a risk).

  • Enforce pick → send → receive logic end-to-end.

  • Review in-transit balances at month-end to prevent COGS distortion.

Fiskal includes transfer reviews in both implementation and quarterly health checks.

Write-off oversight

Small write-off errors create large financial distortion:

  • Require clear write-off reasons.

  • Map each reason to the correct GL.

  • Enforce manager approval.

  • Audit write-offs monthly for anomalies.

Fiskal frequently identifies valuation drift (5–10%) originating from poor write-off governance.

Go-live planning

Accuracy is won or lost during go-live:

  • Run a baseline full stocktake pre-launch.

  • Validate SKU data before imports.

  • Simulate real workflows (returns, multi-order picks, cycle counts) in staging.

  • Maintain dual visibility (manual + WMS) briefly during the transition.

Fiskal’s onboarding process includes pre-go-live reconciliation and a post-go-live audit.

Continuous improvement & monitoring

Long-term accuracy comes from monitoring patterns:

  • Picker accuracy and scan compliance

  • Write-off frequency and root causes

  • Variance trends by bin/zone

  • Stocktake error patterns

Fiskal’s governance routines include monthly, quarterly, and annual reviews designed to catch drift early and maintain system stability.

Leadership view: why this checklist matters

A WMS is a financial system. Misalignment erodes margin accuracy, inflates inventory, distorts COGS, corrupts replenishment and destabilizes audit readiness.

With 50% of companies citing outdated systems as a growth blocker and 42% reporting unintegrated systems as a top issue, getting WMS implementation right is now a strategic necessity.

How Fiskal delivers clean, aligned WMS implementations

Most organizations reach out to Fiskal when the warehouse stops trusting its own numbers. Transfers won’t reconcile. Stocktakes swing wildly from month to month. Restocks inflate revenue instead of correcting it. Write-offs hit the wrong accounts. Finance teams spend hours cleaning up operational inconsistencies that should never reach the ledger.

These issues all point to the same root cause: the WMS was never configured to match how the warehouse actually works. That’s where Fiskal steps in.

Fiskal rebuilds the environment from the ground up. We start with the fundamentals, accurate bins, zones, and scan rules, then correct Cin7 WMS and Core configuration so operational flow and financial mapping finally align. Every workflow is redesigned end-to-end, including receiving, transfers, pick/pack, stocktakes, and restocks, ensuring the system behaves predictably in every scenario.

From there, we validate all known failure modes, write SOPs the warehouse can actually follow, and train teams to maintain accuracy day-to-day. Governance routines are put in place to keep the system stable as processes evolve and the business scales.

This remediation work is delivered through Cin7 Onboarding Support, which gives you a fully aligned, fully trusted WMS environment:

If your WMS isn't producing accurate inventory

The issue isn't your team, it's your setup. Book a Cin7 WMS Implementation Review, and Fiskal will assess your workflows, validate configuration, and rebuild your system for warehouse-aligned, finance-accurate performance.

📞 Or call us directly: (954) 415-7895

Share on your socials.